ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT (LGU) EMPLOYEES IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF BAROTAC NUEVO, ILOILO, PHILIPPINES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501.27059901.2023.3107Keywords:
Organizational Commitment, Government Unit, Barotac Nuevo, IloiloAbstract
The quantitative method of research employing the descriptive survey was the method used. The demographic profile of the respondents showed that most of the respondents are males. As to age, the majority of the respondents are 26-35 years old. In terms of educational qualification, most of the employees are college graduates. The level of organizational commitment of LGU employees in the Municipality of Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo was strongly agreed in all categories, except in the high school graduate respondents were rated agree. Significant differences were noted in all categories. The level of commitment among employees is strongly committed. The significant differences show that employees’ demographic profile greatly influences the level of commitment to the organization. It should be recommended to explore other profiles that are related to the determination of organizational commitment.
Downloads
References
Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An
integrative analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1177-1196.
Aguinis, H. (2009). Performance Management.2nd Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson
Education, Inc.
Allen, N. & Meyer, J. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and
normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative
components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1190-1203.
Becker, T. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they decisions worth making? Academy
of Management Journal, 35, 232-244.
Clements, R., & Swenson, C. H. (2000). Commitment to one.s spouse as a predictor of marital
quality among older couples. Current Psychology, 19(2), 110-119.
Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A Metaanalysis of
the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
Meyer, J. & Allen, N. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational
commitment. Human Resources Management Review, 1(1), 81-89.
Meyer, J. & Allen, N. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Meyer, J.; Paunonen, S.; Gellatly, J.; Goffin, R.; & Jackson, D. (1989). Organizational
commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152-156. 1
Mowday, R.T.; Steers, R.M.; & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational
commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An
interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175-204.
Thompson-Hayes, M., & Webb, L. M. (2004). Theory in progress: Commitment
Under construction: A dyadic and communicative model of marital commitment. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 249-260.
Wasti, S. A. (2005). Commitment profiles: Combinations of organizational commitment forms
and job outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 290-308.
Weigel, D. J., Bennett, K. K., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (2003). Family influences on
commitment: Examining the family of origin correlates of relationship commitment attitudes. Personal Relationships, 10(4), 453-474.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JOHNNY DOLOR, JOY DOLOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
